In McGreevy v. Buffalo Railway Co. (9 Misc. Rep. 726; affd. without opinion, 145 N.Y. 621) a quite similar state of facts was presented.
Summary of this case from Provoost v. International Railway Co.Argued March 4, 1895
Decided March 19, 1895
Porter Norton for appellant.
Harry D. Williams for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In McGreevy v. Buffalo Railway Co. (9 Misc. Rep. 726; affd. without opinion, 145 N.Y. 621) a quite similar state of facts was presented.
Summary of this case from Provoost v. International Railway Co.Full title:MARY McGREEVY, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v . BUFFALO RAILWAY…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 19, 1895
We think, therefore, that the conduct of the plaintiff under the circumstances of this case is to be governed…
Reed v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.When, therefore, the plaintiff looked and listened to see if this car was approaching before he passed upon…