Opinion
January 14, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mirabile, J.).
Corrected amended judgment modified, on the facts, by deleting the first decretal paragraph and all references to the sum of $793,684.95. As so modified, corrected amended judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Trial Term for a new trial solely on the issue of damages, unless within 20 days after service upon plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry, he shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the judgment in his favor to the principal sum of $250,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly. In the event that plaintiff so stipulates, then the corrected amended judgment, as so reduced and further amended, is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Based upon our review of the record, we have determined that the award was excessive to the extent indicated.
However, the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of plaintiff on the issue of liability. There was no evidence that defendant Baranello Sons, Inc., supplied plaintiff with any safety equipment. Its failure to do so renders it absolutely liable to plaintiff pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 240 Lab. of the Labor Law for resulting injuries ( Kalofonos v. State of New York, 104 A.D.2d 75). The fact that there was a ladder in the vicinity does not require any different result because there was no evidence that the ladder was available for plaintiff's use, or that it could have been positioned at the particular section being worked on so as to give plaintiff proper protection while he was working (see Labor Law, § 240, subd 1; cf. Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 102 A.D.2d 993).
The record also demonstrates ample grounds for finding third-party defendant Unit Builders liable to indemnify Dreier Structural Steel Company, Inc., and Baranello Sons, Inc. In addition to the indemnification agreement among the parties, common-law principles of indemnity provide a basis for such a result. Titone, J.P., Bracken, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.