From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGill v. Citibank

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 2015
185 Cal. Rptr. 3d 430 (Cal. 2015)

Summary

In McGill, however, the California Supreme Court ruled that predispute contracts purporting to waive the right to seek the California statutory remedy of public injunctive relief in any forum are contrary to California public policy and thus unenforceable under California law, regardless of whether they are contained in an arbitration agreement.

Summary of this case from McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Opinion

No. S224086.

04-01-2015

McGILL v. CITIBANK.


Opinion

Petition for review granted.

CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., WERDEGAR, CHIN, LIU, CUÉLLAR, and KRUGER, JJ., concur. CORRIGAN, J., was recused and did not participate.


Summaries of

McGill v. Citibank

Supreme Court of California
Apr 1, 2015
185 Cal. Rptr. 3d 430 (Cal. 2015)

In McGill, however, the California Supreme Court ruled that predispute contracts purporting to waive the right to seek the California statutory remedy of public injunctive relief in any forum are contrary to California public policy and thus unenforceable under California law, regardless of whether they are contained in an arbitration agreement.

Summary of this case from McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Case details for

McGill v. Citibank

Case Details

Full title:McGILL v. CITIBANK.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 1, 2015

Citations

185 Cal. Rptr. 3d 430 (Cal. 2015)
345 P.3d 61

Citing Cases

McArdle v. AT&T Mobility LLC

While the arbitration was pending, the California Supreme Court granted a petition for review to assess the…