From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McGee v. Eaton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 23, 1998
142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998)

Summary

In Oakcross Vineyards Ltd., we also pointed out that the question of whether a taxpayer's method of accounting materially distorts or clearly reflects income is one of fact and is to be resolved on a case-by-case basis.

Summary of this case from Osteopathic Med. Oncology & Hematology, P.C. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Opinion


142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998) Wayne P. McGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kim EATON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-36053. No. CV-94-00341-WFN United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit April 23, 1998

Submitted April 20, 1998.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, Wm. Fremming Nielsen, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit JJ.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Oregon state prisoner Wayne P. McGee appeals pro se the district court's dismissal as frivolous of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action seeking damages and injunctive relief from Kim Eaton, the Clerk in Yakima County state court.

Eaton is immune from suit for damages under Section 1983. See generally Moore v. Brewster, 96 F.3d 1240, 1244 (9th Cir.1996) (applying absolute judicial immunity to certain court employees "who perform functions closely associated with the judicial process"). This immunity "extends to actions for declaratory, injunctive and other equitable relief." Id. at 1243. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321). See Marks v. Solcum, 98 F.3d 494 (9th Cir.1996) (per curiam) (applying to appeals pending before April 26, 1996 amended section 1915(e)(2), which requires the court of appeals to dismiss sua sponte an in forma pauperis prisoner appeal if the case seeks monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

McGee v. Eaton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 23, 1998
142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998)

In Oakcross Vineyards Ltd., we also pointed out that the question of whether a taxpayer's method of accounting materially distorts or clearly reflects income is one of fact and is to be resolved on a case-by-case basis.

Summary of this case from Osteopathic Med. Oncology & Hematology, P.C. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
Case details for

McGee v. Eaton

Case Details

Full title:Wayne P. McGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kim EATON, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 23, 1998

Citations

142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Lookofsky (In re Lookofsky)

Perez v. Haverkamp, 142 F.3d 444 (9th Cir. 1998).…

Osteopathic Med. Oncology & Hematology, P.C. v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

I know of no rule of law that forecloses an inquiry into whether, to reflect clearly petitioner's income, the…