From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McFadden v. Morrison

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 6, 2006
Civil No. 06-1106 (MJD/JSM) (D. Minn. Sep. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-1106 (MJD/JSM).

September 6, 2006


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated August 1, 2006. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Docket No. 1), is GRANTED to the extent Petitioner requests a RRC eligibility determination without regard to 28 C.F.R. §§ 570.02 and .21.

2. Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (Docket No. 1), is DENIED to the extent Petitioner seeks immediate transfer to a RRC or immediate determination of his RRC eligibility date.


Summaries of

McFadden v. Morrison

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 6, 2006
Civil No. 06-1106 (MJD/JSM) (D. Minn. Sep. 6, 2006)
Case details for

McFadden v. Morrison

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS JE'VON McFADDEN, Petitioner, v. R.L. MORRISON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 6, 2006

Citations

Civil No. 06-1106 (MJD/JSM) (D. Minn. Sep. 6, 2006)

Citing Cases

Sisneros v. Anderson

To the contrary, this Court finds, as have other courts in this district, that no inmate is entitled to a RRC…

Rudd v. Smith

Id. at *4. Several other courts have reached the same conclusion. McFadden v. Morrison, 2006 WL 2583417 (D.…