From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDowell v. Norfolk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 5, 2007
228 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-1129.

Submitted: May 31, 2007.

Decided: June 5, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00038-D).

Chester Lee McDowell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Max Daniel McGinn, Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey Leonard, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Chester Lee McDowell, Sr. appeals the district court's order granting defendants' motions to dismiss and dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. 2:06-cv-00038-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

McDowell v. Norfolk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 5, 2007
228 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

McDowell v. Norfolk

Case Details

Full title:Chester Lee McDOWELL, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 2007

Citations

228 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Solum v. Certainteed Corp.

Pl.'s Opp'n [D.E. 12] 7. Plaintiffs, however, conflate the requirement that the documents be “authentic” with…

PCS Phosphate Co. v. Am. Home Assurance Co.

[D.E. 75] 6 n.7. Zurich American's statement that it "could not attest to the accuracy" of these policies…