From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Feb 3, 1965
341 F.2d 378 (10th Cir. 1965)

Opinion

No. 7922.

February 3, 1965.

B.F. Napheys, III, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Thomas E. Joyce, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., District of Kansas, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.


The trial court denied without hearing appellant's motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a 10-year sentence imposed on his plea of guilty to a charge of assault with intent to murder. At the time of the commission of the crime appellant was an inmate of the United States penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. One of the grounds asserted for relief is mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea. When such a claim is raised the § 2255 motion may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Nipp v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 711, and Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 710, and cases therein cited.

Reversed and remanded with directions to grant appellant a hearing.


Summaries of

McDonald v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Feb 3, 1965
341 F.2d 378 (10th Cir. 1965)
Case details for

McDonald v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Berl Estes McDONALD, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 1965

Citations

341 F.2d 378 (10th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

Widermyre v. State

Nipp and Ellison hold that when one of the grounds asserted for relief under a § 2255 motion is mental…

U.S. v. Barnes

A defendant who later raises the issue of mental competency at the time of entry of a plea or trial is…