Opinion
A92A2307.
DECIDED MARCH 9, 1993.
Action for damages. Jeff Davis Superior Court. Before Judge Tuten.
David B. Pittman, Nathan B. Deaton, Miles, Baker Morris, Keith M. Morris, for appellants.
Andrew, Threlkeld Ellington, Reid A. Threlkeld, John J. Ellington, for appellee.
Edward and Mary McDonald filed this negligence action against Waunell Simmons, seeking damages for injuries sustained by Mr. McDonald when he fell through the floor of a home the appellants rented from Simmons. At trial, evidence of payments to the appellants or for their benefit from various collateral sources was presented to the jury pursuant to OCGA § 51-12-1 (b), and the jury was charged on the substance of the statute. On March 15, 1991, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Simmons. On that same day, the Georgia Supreme Court decided Denton v. Con-Way Southern Express, 261 Ga. 41 ( 402 S.E.2d 269) (1991). In Denton, the court held OCGA § 51-12-1 (b) unconstitutional. That statute was the only authority under Georgia law for admission of collateral source payment evidence. The McDonalds filed a motion for a new trial asserting, inter alia, that the court erred in charging the jury on OCGA § 51-12-1 (b). Thereafter, judgment was entered on the verdict and the McDonalds' motion for a new trial was denied. The McDonalds appeal. We reverse.
1. In Anepohl v. Ferber, 202 Ga. App. 552 ( 415 S.E.2d 9) (1992), we held that Denton must be applied retroactively to those cases still pending at the time Denton was decided. The appellants are correct in arguing that the holding in Denton should have been applied retroactively to their motion for a new trial. See Tyler v. Roberts, 204 Ga. App. 380, 381 ( 419 S.E.2d 103) (1992). Simmons' argument that the appellants waived their objection to the unconstitutional charge because they failed to object to the charge on that ground at trial is without merit. See Roberts v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 205 Ga. App. 594, 595 ( 423 S.E.2d 16) (1992); see also Tyler, supra.
2. We need not reach the appellants' remaining enumeration of error in view of our decision in Division 1.
Judgment reversed. Pope, C. J., and Carley, P. J., concur.