From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDONALD v. SANTE FE TRIAL TRANSPORTATION CO

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 21, 1975
513 F.2d 90 (5th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-2813.

May 21, 1975.

James Bullock, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Benjamin R. Powel, Robert W. Alexander, Galveston, Tex., for Sante Fe Trial Transp.

James P. Wolf, Houston, Tex., for Local 988.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.

Before WISDOM, SIMPSON and RONEY, Circuit Judges.


42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 gives all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States the same right to equal benefit of the laws "as is enjoyed by white citizens." The district court held that this section confers no actionable rights upon white persons, and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction the § 1981 claim brought by the two white plaintiffs. We affirm. Perkins v. Banster, 190 F. Supp. 98 (D.Md.), aff'd, 285 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1960); Kurylas v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, 373 F. Supp. 1072 (D.D.C. 1974); Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corp., 368 F. Supp. 829 (N.D.Cal. 1973); Ripp v. Dobbs Houses, Inc., 366 F. Supp. 205 (N.D.Ala. 1973). Contra, WRMA Broadcasting Co. v. Hawthorne, 365 F. Supp. 577 (M.D.Ala. 1973); Gannon v. Action, 303 F. Supp. 1240 (E.D.Mo. 1969), aff'd in part, remanded in part on other grounds, 450 F.2d 1227 (8th Cir. 1971); Central Presbyterian Church v. Black Liberation Front, 303 F. Supp. 894 (E.D.Mo. 1969).

We likewise agree with the district court's conclusion that an employer's dismissal of white employees charged with misappropriating company property while not dismissing a similarly charged black employee does not raise a claim upon which relief may be granted under Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e et seq. There is no allegation that the plaintiffs were falsely charged. Disciplinary action for offenses not constituting crimes is not involved in this case. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Cf. NLRB v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp., 306 U.S. 240, 59 S.Ct. 490, 83 L.Ed. 627 (1939); Nix v. NLRB, 418 F.2d 1001, 1006 (5th Cir. 1969); AHI Machine Tool Die, Inc. v. NLRB, 432 F.2d 190 (6th Cir. 1970).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McDONALD v. SANTE FE TRIAL TRANSPORTATION CO

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
May 21, 1975
513 F.2d 90 (5th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

McDONALD v. SANTE FE TRIAL TRANSPORTATION CO

Case Details

Full title:L.N. McDONALD AND RAYMOND LAIRD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE SANTE FE…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: May 21, 1975

Citations

513 F.2d 90 (5th Cir. 1975)

Citing Cases

Spiess v. C. Itoh & Co.

This Court has previously ruled to the contrary on the question of white citizens' standing to sue under §…

McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.

Pp. 285-296. 513 F.2d 90, reversed and remanded. MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which…