From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McDonald v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 27, 1980
245 Ga. 355 (Ga. 1980)

Summary

explaining that, in the fraudulent-concealment context, “reasonable diligence . . . must be measured by the prudent-man standard which is an objective one”

Summary of this case from Am. Builders Ins. Co. v. Keystone Insurers Grp.

Opinion

36099.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1980.

Contempt. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Dean.

J. Eugene Wilson, for appellant.

Phillips, Hart Mozely, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a contempt order entered subsequent to July 1, 1979. The appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the provisions of Code Ann. § 6-701.1 (Ga. L. 1979, pp. 619, 620).

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 27, 1980.


Summaries of

McDonald v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Georgia
Feb 27, 1980
245 Ga. 355 (Ga. 1980)

explaining that, in the fraudulent-concealment context, “reasonable diligence . . . must be measured by the prudent-man standard which is an objective one”

Summary of this case from Am. Builders Ins. Co. v. Keystone Insurers Grp.
Case details for

McDonald v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:McDONALD v. McDONALD

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Feb 27, 1980

Citations

245 Ga. 355 (Ga. 1980)
265 S.E.2d 7

Citing Cases

Am. Builders Ins. Co. v. Keystone Insurers Grp.

Compare Sheet Metal Workers, Local 19 v. 2300 Grp., Inc., 949 F.2d 1274, 1280 (3d Cir. 1991) (explaining the…

Rai v. Reid

Stewart v. Warner, supra at 323, 571 S.E.2d 189. In so doing, that Court cited, inter alia, Jim Walter Corp.…