From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mccutchen v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Oct 25, 2019
221 A.3d 922 (D.C. 2019)

Summary

declining to apply per se test to regulation requiring gun owners to destroy bump-stock devices

Summary of this case from Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

Opinion

17-CV-357

10-25-2019

MCCUTCHEN, Jr. v. US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed


Summaries of

Mccutchen v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Oct 25, 2019
221 A.3d 922 (D.C. 2019)

declining to apply per se test to regulation requiring gun owners to destroy bump-stock devices

Summary of this case from Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
Case details for

Mccutchen v. U.S. Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:MCCUTCHEN, Jr. v. US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Date published: Oct 25, 2019

Citations

221 A.3d 922 (D.C. 2019)

Citing Cases

McCutchen v. United States

It principally relied on the "police power" doctrine, concluding that, because the Final Rule sought to…

Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.

On the law, it is unclear whether the "per se" test for regulatory takings applies in the context of personal…