From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCurdy v. Wheeler

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 7, 1956
235 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1956)

Opinion

No. 13156.

Argued May 24, 1956.

Decided June 7, 1956.

Mr. Mark P. Friedlander, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Mr. Eugene L. Goodridge, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Gregory Hankin, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and BASTIAN and BURGER, Circuit Judges.


The question on this appeal is whether a deed from certain persons (other than the appellants), conveying a certain lot to the appellee "subject to a right of way as granted by deed recorded * * * (in) the Land Records of the District of Columbia" re-established that right of way, which easement had been extinguished prior to the date of the conveyance by adverse user.

The right of way had been blocked by a metal garage for nearly thirty years, thus denying access to the dominant estate.

The District Court held that "the notation of said easement of record in the deed * * * to plaintiff [appellee] was a nullity," and did not re-establish the right of way. We agree.

The easement was also held by the District Court to have been extinguished by the merger of estates, and with this view we also agree.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

McCurdy v. Wheeler

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Jun 7, 1956
235 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1956)
Case details for

McCurdy v. Wheeler

Case Details

Full title:Charles P. McCURDY, Jr., and Harriett Shaw McCurdy, Appellants, v. Asher…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 1956

Citations

235 F.2d 22 (D.C. Cir. 1956)

Citing Cases

Dickerson v. Worldcom Network Services Inc.

Moreover, contrary to WorldCom's assertion, the mere reference to an already extinguished easement does not…

Faulconer v. Williams

Although Oregon courts have not before considered the question, courts in other jurisdictions virtually are…