Opinion
Argued October 21, 1896
Decided December 1, 1896
Charles J. Bissell for appellant.
Thomas Raines for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except HAIGHT, J., not sitting, and MARTIN, J., not voting.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
McCruden v. Rochester Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1896
45 N.E. 1134 (N.Y. 1896)
Summaries of
McCruden v. Rochester Railway Company
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1896
45 N.E. 1134 (N.Y. 1896)
Case details for
McCruden v. Rochester Railway Company
Case Details
Full title:BRIDGET McCRUDEN, Respondent, v . THE ROCHESTER RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 1, 1896
Citations
45 N.E. 1134 (N.Y. 1896)
45 N.E. 1134
Citing Cases
Donahue v. Keystone Gas Co.
If the plaintiff had owned to the center of the highway, his right to recover damages would be beyond…