From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCrimon v. Zolt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION
Dec 14, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-132 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 14, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-132

12-14-2020

CHEYANNE MCCRIMON, Plaintiff, v. IRA MIKE ZOLT, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff, who resides in Thomasville, Georgia, filed a Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e for employment discrimination. Doc. 1. Plaintiff identifies Defendant as the operator of a Chick-fil-a restaurant in Thomasville, Georgia. Plaintiff is clearly attacking events occurring in Thomas County, Georgia. Id.

A district court may raise the issue of defective venue sua sponte. Collins v. Hagel, No. 1:13-CV-2051, 2015 WL 5691076, at *1 (N.D. Ga. Sept. 28, 2015) (citing Kapordelis v. Danzig, 387 F. App'x 905, 906-07 (11th Cir. 2010) (affirming sua sponte transfer, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), of pro se prisoner's civil rights action from New York to Georgia), and collecting cases)). When venue is improper, a court "shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district . . . in which it could have been brought." 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). "The court may transfer the case if (1) the proposed transferee court is one in which the action 'could have been brought' and (2) transfer would be 'in the interest of justice.'" Leach v. Peacock, Civil Action No. 2:09cv738, 2011 WL 1130596, at *4 (M.D. Ala. Mar. 25, 2011) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a)). Trial courts generally have broad discretion in determining whether to transfer or dismiss a case. Id. (citing England v. ITT Thompson Indus., Inc., 856 F.2d 1518, 1520 (11th Cir. 1988)).

This Court is not the proper venue to hear Plaintiff's claims against the named Defendant. Section 1391(b) of Title 28 of the United States Code sets forth the applicable venue provisions:

A civil action may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court's personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.
Plaintiff clearly complains about events occurring in Thomas County, Georgia, which is within the Middle District of Georgia. 28 U.S.C. § 90(b)(7). Thus, venue is proper in that District. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2). Accordingly, the Court TRANSFERS Plaintiff's Complaint and this case to the Thomasville Division of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia in the interest of justice.

SO ORDERED, this 14th day of December, 2020.

/s/_________

BENJAMIN W. CHEESBRO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA


Summaries of

McCrimon v. Zolt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION
Dec 14, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-132 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 14, 2020)
Case details for

McCrimon v. Zolt

Case Details

Full title:CHEYANNE MCCRIMON, Plaintiff, v. IRA MIKE ZOLT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA BRUNSWICK DIVISION

Date published: Dec 14, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:20-cv-132 (S.D. Ga. Dec. 14, 2020)