From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCrea v. McClenahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 1909
131 App. Div. 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Summary

In McCrea v. McClenahan (131 App. Div. 247) the court said: "This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain goods concededly belonging to the plaintiff and left by him in the possession of the defendant David Stevenson Brewing Company, of which the defendant McClenahan was president at the time of the alleged conversion, and by whose personal action the conversion was consummated.

Summary of this case from Debobes v. Butterly

Opinion

March 19, 1909.

Harlan F. Stone, for the appellant.

J. Rider Cady [ Thomas J. Farrell with him on the brief], for the respondent McClenahan.


This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain goods concededly belonging to the plaintiff and left by him in the possession of the defendant David Stevenson Brewing Company, of which the defendant McClenahan was president at the time of the alleged conversion, and by whose personal action the conversion was consummated. Upon the trial, the learned justice presiding dismissed the complaint as to the defendant McClenahan, and upon the jury finding a verdict for $2,500 the same was set aside as being excessive. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing the complaint as to the defendant McClenahan.

We are unable to discover any good reason for dismissing the complaint as against McClenahan. He was the president, and apparently in charge of the brewing company's business. It was he who refused to give up possession of the chattels concededly belonging to the plaintiff, his refusal being based upon an assumed right to a lien upon the same for storage. The tortious act was his own act, and the fact that he was also acting in behalf of the brewing company does not serve to relieve him from personal responsibility. ( Rodney Hunt Machine Co. v. Stewart, 57 Hun, 545, 553.)

The judgment appealed from should be reversed.

HIRSCHBERG, P.J., JENKS, GAYNOR and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event.


Summaries of

McCrea v. McClenahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 19, 1909
131 App. Div. 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

In McCrea v. McClenahan (131 App. Div. 247) the court said: "This action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of certain goods concededly belonging to the plaintiff and left by him in the possession of the defendant David Stevenson Brewing Company, of which the defendant McClenahan was president at the time of the alleged conversion, and by whose personal action the conversion was consummated.

Summary of this case from Debobes v. Butterly
Case details for

McCrea v. McClenahan

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM G. McCREA, Appellant, v . JAMES McCLENAHAN, Respondent, Impleaded…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 19, 1909

Citations

131 App. Div. 247 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
115 N.Y.S. 720

Citing Cases

PDK Labs, Inc. v. G.M.G. Trans West Corp.

39 Winfield Assoc., 30 A.D.3d 458, 458, 820 N.Y.S.2d 279). “A corporate officer may be liable for torts…

Santa Barbara v. Avallone Miele, Inc.

The officers, Avallone and Miele, had knowledge of these facts and became personally liable for the…