Summary
finding that the plaintiff's "general allegations of discrimination in the EEOC complaint [where the only specific allegation was that she was wrongfully terminated after being accused of theft] would not likely lead to an investigation regarding pay, scheduling, discipline, training, promotion, retaliation (for incidents other than her allegedly retaliatory discharge) and hostile work environment racial harassment"
Summary of this case from Kadribasic v. Wal-Mart, Inc.Opinion
CASE NO. 1:06-cv-1123-MEF.
March 17, 2009
ORDER
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #70) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 6, 2009 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #67) filed on February 23, 2009 is adopted;
3. That the motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. #40) and the motion for summary judgment (Doc. #42) are GRANTED, the motion for denial of summary judgment (Doc. #52) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED.