From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCoy v. Helsby

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 8, 1971
28 N.Y.2d 790 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

protecting Judiciary's "basic fibre of administrative power" against statutory intrusion

Summary of this case from People v. Correa

Opinion

Argued February 25, 1971

Decided April 8, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Lawrence N. Marcus for appellant.

Jerome Lefkowitz for respondents.

John I. Coster for Court Officials Council of New York, amicus curiae.


Order affirmed, without costs, in the following memorandum: The order appealed from should be affirmed on the opinion at the Appellate Division. We would only add that the subjection of the board to certain legislative action, such as the Taylor Law, does not derogate its basic administrative control over the court system, but, rather, only requires the board to be subject to certain reasonable limitations in the exercise of this power. It may be that some future legislative action would so deeply cut at the basic fibre of administrative power as to be violative of section 28 of article VI of the Constitution. The application of the Taylor Law, however, is not such a case.

Concur: Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN and JASEN. Judge BREITEL concurs solely upon the opinion at the Appellate Division. Taking no part: Chief Judge FULD and Judge GIBSON.


Summaries of

McCoy v. Helsby

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 8, 1971
28 N.Y.2d 790 (N.Y. 1971)

protecting Judiciary's "basic fibre of administrative power" against statutory intrusion

Summary of this case from People v. Correa
Case details for

McCoy v. Helsby

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS F. McCOY, as State Administrator and Secretary to the…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 8, 1971

Citations

28 N.Y.2d 790 (N.Y. 1971)
321 N.Y.S.2d 902
270 N.E.2d 722

Citing Cases

People v. Correa

To do so would vitiate the intent of the framers and the Legislature that section 28 separately empowers the…

Matter of Util. Wkrs. v. Pub. Employment rel

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondent's determination inter alia suspending…