From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCormack v. Holbrook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1917
176 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

January, 1917.


This is an appeal by a corporation not a party to the action, from an order of the Special Term that denies its motion to vacate an order directing that before trial the said corporation, "by Messrs. Birmingham and Russell, employed by the said company in its New York Branch * * * be examined and their depositions be taken pursuant to section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure." The said motion included an application by the corporation for leave to intervene for the purposes of this motion. The order must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. ( Chartered Bank of India v. North River Ins. Co., 136 App. Div. 648.) Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, and without prejudice to any future application to examine Messrs. Birmingham and Russell, the persons named in the order as individuals.


Summaries of

McCormack v. Holbrook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1917
176 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

McCormack v. Holbrook

Case Details

Full title:JOHN McCORMACK, as Administrator, etc., of JAMES McCORMACK, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1917

Citations

176 App. Div. 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Citing Cases

Southbridge Finishing Co. v. Golding

The cases are in conflict as to whether the term "any other person" is broad enough to cover corporations.…

Matter of National City Bank of New York

( Van Slyke v. Hyatt, 46 N.Y. 259. ) This is with respect to evidence of the transaction in 1912 affecting…