From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McConoughey v. Torrence

Supreme Court of California
Apr 21, 1899
124 Cal. 330 (Cal. 1899)

Opinion

         APPLICATION in the Supreme Court for mandamus to the Judge of the Superior Court of San Diego County, to compel the settlement of a statement on appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of that county. E. S. Torrence, Judge.

         COUNSEL

          A. M. McConoughey, Petitioner, in pro. per.


         JUDGES: In Bank.

         OPINION

         THE COURT

         This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent to settle a statement on appeal. The appeal was taken within sixty days after July 28, 1898. The refusal to settle the statement was made final and definite by an order of respondent made and entered October 11, 1898. This proceeding to compel settlement was not commenced until March 24, 1899, and the application must be denied upon the ground of laches. (Depeaux v. Peck , 118 Cal. 522.)


Summaries of

McConoughey v. Torrence

Supreme Court of California
Apr 21, 1899
124 Cal. 330 (Cal. 1899)
Case details for

McConoughey v. Torrence

Case Details

Full title:A. M. McCONOUGHEY, Petitioner, v. E. S. TORRENCE, Judge of Superior Court…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Apr 21, 1899

Citations

124 Cal. 330 (Cal. 1899)
57 P. 81

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Superior Court

The same rule applies to original proceedings for mandate in the appellate courts. (See McConoughey v.…

Derr v. Busick

No excuse was offered herein for the delay, and the courts look with disfavor upon such lack of diligence. (…