From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCollum Manufacturing Co. v. Department of Trans

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 24, 1975
218 S.E.2d 926 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50958.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 15, 1975.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1975.

Condemnation. Habersham Superior Court. Before Judge Gunter.

Oliver Oliver, Robert F. Oliver, for appellant.

Millard B. Shepherd, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Bruce M. Edenfield, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.


The appellant in this condemnation case has failed to properly argue the various enumerations of error according to the rules of this court. The argument consists of nothing other than quotations from three decisions of this court on the general subject of just and adequate compensation and consequential damages, with no accompanying reference to the record or transcript, which would show that the citations have any bearing on this case. This failure to properly argue constitutes an abandonment and the enumerations will not be considered. Rule 18 (c) (2) (Code Ann. § 24-3618). Watts v. Mylius, 124 Ga. App. 475 ( 184 S.E.2d 195).

Judgment affirmed. Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.


ARGUED SEPTEMBER 15, 1975 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1975.


Summaries of

McCollum Manufacturing Co. v. Department of Trans

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 24, 1975
218 S.E.2d 926 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

McCollum Manufacturing Co. v. Department of Trans

Case Details

Full title:McCOLLUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 24, 1975

Citations

218 S.E.2d 926 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
218 S.E.2d 926

Citing Cases

Windjammer Associates v. Hodge

" Indeed, we cannot ascertain that the second enumeration of error has been supported in any manner "by…

Ricks v. State

While defendant contends that a motion to suppress all evidence was made and designates same as "T-1" in the…