From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClure v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2015
No. 11-CV-12035-DT (E.D. Mich. Jan. 15, 2015)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-12035-DT

01-15-2015

TIMOTHY D. McCLURE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 15, 2015 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge

This Section 1983 prisoner civil rights matter having come before the Court on the December 3, 2014 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives recommending that the Court grant the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and Plaintiff having timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation; and after filing Plaintiff's objections, Plaintiff's pro bono appointed counsel, Brett Asher of Kerr, Russell and Weber PLC, with the concurrence of his client, having moved to withdraw as counsel in this matter; the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Objections, Kerr, Russell and Weber's Motion to Withdraw, and the Court's entire file of this action, and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be granted and this case should, accordingly, be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of December 3, 2014 [Dkt. # 42] be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 26] be, and hereby is, GRANTED. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's December 3, 2014 Report and Recommendation, this Court certifies that any appeal by Plaintiff would be frivolous and not in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Kerr, Russell and Weber PLC's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff [Dkt. # 44] is GRANTED.

s/Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: January 15, 2015 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on January 15, 2015, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135


Summaries of

McClure v. City of Detroit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 15, 2015
No. 11-CV-12035-DT (E.D. Mich. Jan. 15, 2015)
Case details for

McClure v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY D. McCLURE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 15, 2015

Citations

No. 11-CV-12035-DT (E.D. Mich. Jan. 15, 2015)

Citing Cases

Peterson v. Burris

Trentadue v. Buckler Lawn Sprinkler, 479 Mich. 378, 407(2007). Trentadue essentially eliminated the…

Davis v. Cox

Even if the federal standard for equitable tolling applied, Plaintiff would still lose. Under that standard,…