From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McClinton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 21, 1991
588 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2282.

November 21, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Helio Gomez, Richard F. Conrad, Judges.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, Kenneth Witts, Asst. Public Defender, and Sophia S. Ehringer, Certified Legal Intern, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Judy Taylor Rush, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING


We withdraw the previous opinion and substitute the following in its stead.

The state has pointed out in its motion for rehearing that because no judgment was rendered this court has no jurisdiction to do anything except dismiss this appeal. That is correct. Owens v. State, 579 So.2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Because this court never had jurisdiction, the trial court does. Relief can be sought below.

Appeal dismissed.

COWART and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McClinton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Nov 21, 1991
588 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

McClinton v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE MIKE McCLINTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Nov 21, 1991

Citations

588 So. 2d 701 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Connor v. State

Moreover, the oral ruling that "[i]f there's no number established within six weeks, the number will be zero"…