From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCann v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1901
59 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1901)

Opinion

Argued January 8, 1901

Decided February 26, 1901

John Whalen, Corporation Counsel ( Theodore Connoly and Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.

Carlos C. Alden and Austen G. Fox for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

The court does not consider the constitutional question, because it is not plainly presented in the complaint, and for the additional reason that counsel expressly waived its consideration on the argument; no opinion.

Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, BARTLETT, HAIGHT, MARTIN, VANN and LANDON, JJ.


Summaries of

McCann v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 26, 1901
59 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1901)
Case details for

McCann v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:HUGH McCANN, JR., as Administrator of DANIEL F. McCANN, Deceased…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 26, 1901

Citations

59 N.E. 1125 (N.Y. 1901)
59 N.E. 1125

Citing Cases

Ryan v. City of New York

( McMahon v. Mayor, 22 App. Div. 113; McCann v. City of New York, 52 id. 358; McAvoy v. City of New York, Id.…

Matter of Auguti v. City Civil Service

the comptroller to investigate the petitioners' complaints and to discharge his duty by making a…