From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McCall v. Sustair

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1912
76 S.E. 527 (N.C. 1912)

Opinion

(Filed 11 December, 1912.)

PETITION to rehear this cause by plaintiff, reported in 157 N.C. 179.

Burwell Cansler, R. S. Hutchinson, and McCall Smith for plaintiff.

Stewart McRae and Maxwell Keerans for defendant.


We have considered carefully the petition to rehear in this case and the briefs filed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff in support of it, as well as those filed by the defendant.

The majority of the Court is of opinion that no authority was overlooked in the opinion of the Chief Justice and that no question has been raised by the petition to rehear which was not considered on the former hearing.

We are of opinion that the case was fully covered by the opinion of the Chief Justice, affirming the judgment of his Honor, Judge Biggs.

The petition to rehear is dismissed.

WALKER, J., and HOKE, J., dissenting.

(214)


Summaries of

McCall v. Sustair

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 1, 1912
76 S.E. 527 (N.C. 1912)
Case details for

McCall v. Sustair

Case Details

Full title:M. D. McCALL v. J. T. SUSTAIR ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1912

Citations

76 S.E. 527 (N.C. 1912)
161 N.C. 213

Citing Cases

State v. Neville

The special term began 8 October. The sentence and appeal were entered 13 October. With reasonable diligence,…

Flake v. News Co.

36 C. J., 1150; Baker v. Winslow, 184 N.C. 1; Fields v. Bynum, 156 N.C. 413; New York Evening Post Co. v.…