From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MC KEE v. HARRIS-SEYBOLD CO

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 8, 1972
118 N.J. Super. 480 (App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

Argued February 23, 1972 —

Decided March 8, 1972.

Appeal from Superior Court, Law Division

Before Judges LEWIS, HALPERN and LORA.

Mr. Norman S. Costanza argued the cause for appellant, Miehle-Goss-Dexter, Inc.

Mr. Joseph J. MacDonald argued the cause for respondents, Edward B. McKee and Barbara McKee ( Messrs. Harrison, Hartman and MacDonald, attorneys).


The trial judge's rulings from which defendant appeals not having been shown to be prejudicial and a review of the record disclosing neither prejudice nor error as alleged by appellant in the court's comments during trial, the judgment in favor of plaintiffs is affirmed.

Plaintiffs also urge that under the recently adopted R. 4:42-11(b) (effective January 31, 1972) interest should be allowed on the amounts of the judgment from February 5, 1969, the date of the institution of the action. We hold this rule does not apply retroactively to judgments entered prior to its effective date.


Summaries of

MC KEE v. HARRIS-SEYBOLD CO

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Mar 8, 1972
118 N.J. Super. 480 (App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

MC KEE v. HARRIS-SEYBOLD CO

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD B. MC KEE AND BARBARA MC KEE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Mar 8, 1972

Citations

118 N.J. Super. 480 (App. Div. 1972)
288 A.2d 585

Citing Cases

Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.

"(4) The purchasing corporation assumes those liabilities and obligations of the seller ordinarily necessary…

Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.

The principle is well settled that where one company sells or otherwise transfers all of its assets to…