From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mays v. Hi Way 99 Indus. Sites LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:10-1560 JAM-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-1560 JAM-GGH

09-12-2011

RAYMOND MAYS and MICHAEL CARR, Plaintiffs, v. HI WAY 99 INDUSTRIAL SITES, LLC, Defendant.

Christopher K. Eley, Attorney for Defendants Thomas N. Stewart, III, Attorney for Plaintiffs


THOMAS N. STEWART, III - #88128

ATTORNEY AT LAW

Attorneys for Raymond Mays

and Michael Carr

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER

The parties hereto stipulate as follows:

The parties have reached a full and final settlement of all issues in this action. A Settlement Agreement between the parties has been fully executed.

Some parts of the Settlement Agreement are to be performed in the future. The parties shall comply with their Settlement Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth. The parties request the Court to retain jurisdiction for 18 months from the date hereof in order to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. Of America, 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994).

Although the parties are hereby dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that the Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement for 18 months after the date hereof.

Christopher K. Eley,

Attorney for Defendants

Thomas N. Stewart, III,

Attorney for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED:

John A. Mendez

U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mays v. Hi Way 99 Indus. Sites LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
Case No. 2:10-1560 JAM-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Mays v. Hi Way 99 Indus. Sites LLC

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND MAYS and MICHAEL CARR, Plaintiffs, v. HI WAY 99 INDUSTRIAL SITES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-1560 JAM-GGH (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Citing Cases

Commercial Sav. Bank v. Balderston

It is likewise the settled rule of law in this state that where the evidence shows that a conveyance of…

Winnebago Auto Co. v. Bilstad

"It is likewise the settled rule of law in this state that where the evidence shows that a conveyance of…