From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayor v. Third Avenue Railroad Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1865
33 N.Y. 42 (N.Y. 1865)

Opinion

June Term, 1865

Clarkson N. Potter, for the appellant.


Our decision at the March Term in the case of the Mayor, c., New York, v. Second Avenue Rail Road Company, substantially disposes of this question. ( 32 N.Y., 5 Tiffany, 261.) The increase of the sum payable as a license fee under the ordinance of 1858, beyond the amount provided for by the stipulations in the contract of 1853, so far as it was in derogation of the defendant's rights, must be deemed illegal and void. It was not the exercise of the power of municipal regulation reserved by the terms of the grant, and which the common council had no authority to alienate; but it was simply an attempt by one of the parties to a contract to revoke a provision inserted for the benefit of the other.

The common council could not lawfully impose a penalty for non-compliance with an illegal exaction. The judgment should be reversed, with judgment for the defendant on the demurrer.

All the judges concurring,

Judgment reversed.


Summaries of

Mayor v. Third Avenue Railroad Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 1, 1865
33 N.Y. 42 (N.Y. 1865)
Case details for

Mayor v. Third Avenue Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND COMMONALTY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondents, v…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 1, 1865

Citations

33 N.Y. 42 (N.Y. 1865)

Citing Cases

Metropolitan Street Ry. Co. v. New York

In the State of New York a city can not exact additional compensation or payments by subsequent ordinance,…

Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.

(Murray v. City of Charleston , 96 U.S. 445; Dodge v. Woolsey, 18 Howard U.S. 311; State Bank of Ohio v.…