From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MAYOR v. MILN

U.S.
Jan 1, 1835
34 U.S. 85 (1835)

Opinion

JANUARY TERM, 1835.

The court refused to take up cases involving constitutional questions, when the court was not full.

Mr Ogden, for The Mayor, c. of New York; and Mr Wilde, for George Briscoe and others, inquired, if the court had come to a final decision as to the argument of the cases involving constitutional questions at the present term.


WRIT of error to the circuit court of the United States for the eastern district of New York.

WRIT of error to the circuit court of the United States for the district of Kentucky.


The court cannot know whether there will be a full court during the term; but as the court is now composed, the constitutional cases will not be taken up.

The court was, at the time this motion was made, and during the whole term, composed of six justices; the vacancy occasioned by the resignation of Mr Justice DUVAL, not having been filled.

12th February 1835.


Summaries of

MAYOR v. MILN

U.S.
Jan 1, 1835
34 U.S. 85 (1835)
Case details for

MAYOR v. MILN

Case Details

Full title:MAYOR, ETC. OF NEW YORK v. GEORGE MILN. GEORGE BRISCOE AND OTHERS v. THE…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1835

Citations

34 U.S. 85 (1835)

Citing Cases

United States v. Fox

New York is sovereign, except where she has surrendered her sovereignty to the United States. The latter is…

Lever Brothers Co. v. Commonwealth

See St. 1903, c. 437, §§ 45 and 90 as to domestic corporations. Whether it is valid under the police power of…