From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 16, 1952
9 N.J. 605 (N.J. 1952)

Opinion

Argued June 9, 1952 —

Decided June 16, 1952.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Meyer E. Ruback argued the cause for the appellant ( Messrs. Ruback, Albach Weisman and Mr. Alfred C. Clapp, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Brogan argued the cause for the respondent Thor Corporation.

Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for the respondent Teldisco, Inc. ( Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter Reitman, attorneys).


The orders will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinions of Judge Francis in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 16, 1952
9 N.J. 605 (N.J. 1952)
Case details for

Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MAYFLOWER INDUSTRIES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THOR CORPORATION, AN…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 16, 1952

Citations

9 N.J. 605 (N.J. 1952)
89 A.2d 242

Citing Cases

Toft v. Ketchum

See Mayflower Industriesv. Thor Corp., 15 N.J. Super. 139, 151 ( Ch. Div. 1951) affirmed 9 N.J. 605 (1952).…

Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.

While we are satisfied that the sweeping Kamm principles may not here be invoked, we are equally satisfied…