From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 1, 2002
86 S.W.3d 143 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 80507

October 1, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Dennis J. Kehm, Judge.

Lisa M. Stroup, Assisstant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Sara L. Trower, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and George W. Draper III, J.



ORDER


Robin Mayer (hereinafter, "Movant") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims his trial counsel denied him effective assistance of counsel by failing to investigate and present expert testimony in the areas of toxicology and accident reconstruction which he claims would provide him with a viable defense.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcripts and find the motion's court decision was not clearly erroneous. White v. State, 939 S.W.2d 887, 904 (Mo.banc 1997). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Mayer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Oct 1, 2002
86 S.W.3d 143 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Mayer v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN MAYER, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Oct 1, 2002

Citations

86 S.W.3d 143 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Mayer v. Dormire

Exh. A.) On February 3, 2000, petitioner filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri…