From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mayer v. Publishers Clearing House

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1994
205 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 6, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for breach of contract and promissory estoppel based upon the rescission by the defendant, Publishers Clearing House, of a written offer of employment after he had accepted it. The offer failed to indicate a specified term of employment, nor did it state that the plaintiff's employment could only be terminated for cause.

"It is well settled that neither party has a cause of action for breach of contract where the contract is one for employment at will * * *. In order for an employee to prevail on an action for breach of an employment contract, he must show that the contract was for a specified duration, or that he expressly conditioned acceptance of the job on the employer's assurance that he would not discharge him without cause" (Lerman v. Medical Assocs., 160 A.D.2d 838, 839; see also, Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, 69 N.Y.2d 329; Bower v. Atlis Sys., 182 A.D.2d 951). Thus, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the breach of contract cause of action.

In addition, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the promissory estoppel cause of action. That the defendant promised the plaintiff employment and suggested some terms of employment which led the plaintiff to leave his former job does not constitute promissory estoppel (see, Dalton v. Union Bank, 134 A.D.2d 174). Bracken, J.P., Miller, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mayer v. Publishers Clearing House

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 6, 1994
205 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Mayer v. Publishers Clearing House

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MAYER, Appellant, v. PUBLISHERS CLEARING HOUSE, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 6, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 190

Citing Cases

Marzouk v. CIT Grp., Inc.

This action is essentially a wrongful discharge case. The principle "is well settled that neither party has a…

Skibinski v. Collezion

The plaintiff admitted that there was no written contract of employment, the job was not for a specified…