From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

May Dept Stores, v. Commr of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jul 30, 1975
519 F.2d 1154 (8th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 74-1996.

Submitted June 11, 1975.

Decided July 30, 1975.

Robert A. Bernstein, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Lyman G. Friedman, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Appeal from the Tax Court.

Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge, and LAY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.


This is a timely appeal by the Commissioner from the decision of the Tax Court holding that the value of the land conveyed to the taxpayer, The May Department Stores Company, by developer of a shopping center in return for taxpayer's agreement to locate and maintain a retail store on the site conveyed is excludable from taxpayer's gross income as a contribution to capital under § 118(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 ( 26 U.S.C. § 118(a)).

The Tax Court's opinion upon which its decision is based is reported at 33 T.C.M. 1128 (1974). The Tax Court's opinion sets out the facts, which are stipulated for the most part, and applicable law. The Tax Court determined that the benefits sought by the grantors were indirect and intangible and that the value of the land conveyed to taxpayer was a capital contribution within the meaning of § 118(a), and as such properly excluded from taxpayer's gross income. The Tax Court's findings are supported by substantial evidence and not induced by any erroneous view of the law.

We affirm on the basis of the Tax Court's opinion.


Summaries of

May Dept Stores, v. Commr of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jul 30, 1975
519 F.2d 1154 (8th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

May Dept Stores, v. Commr of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:THE MAY DEPARTMENT STORES COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jul 30, 1975

Citations

519 F.2d 1154 (8th Cir. 1975)

Citing Cases

Sprint Nextel Corporation. Subsidiaries v. U.S.

Plaintiffs also rely on a number of decisions by federal circuit courts of appeal, which reason that…

In re Elder-Beerman Stores Corp.

The Sixth Circuit has already held that a developer's payments to a prospective anchor store tenant were…