affirming a facial challenge but "remand[ing] so that the judgment can be amended to state that it is without prejudice as to an ‘as applied challenge’ "
Summary of this case from Young v. HawaiiNo. 98-56729.
November 12, 1999.
Appeal from the C.D.Cal.
Affirmed.
affirming a facial challenge but "remand[ing] so that the judgment can be amended to state that it is without prejudice as to an ‘as applied challenge’ "
Summary of this case from Young v. HawaiiFull title:Maxtech Holding, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Nov 12, 1999
Thus, it is unclear whether he could bring his complaint anew given the current disposition of the case. See…
Woodroffe v. OregonIn order to renew this motion, however, Plaintiff must show how the issues in the case are so complex as to…