From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock

Supreme Court of Texas
May 2, 1979
580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1979)

Summary

In Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, 580 S.W.2d 340, 341 (Tex. 1979), that court expressly declined to express any opinion on the correctness of the Court of Civil Appeals' holding that prejudgment interest for a breach of contract occurring in 1966 was limited to a six percent rate. Furthermore, that court in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chance, 590 S.W.2d 703, 704 (Tex. 1979), permitted a nine percent rate to stand on an award to an insured who sued to recover for a fire loss, even though the applicable statutory rate for prejudgment interest was only six percent.

Summary of this case from Union Bank of Benton, Ark. v. First Nat. Bank

Opinion

No. B-8010.

March 14, 1979. Rehearing Denied May 2, 1979.

Appeal from the District Court, No. 72, Lubbock County, Bevers, J.

Simon Simon, Harold D. Hammett and Mike Liles, Fort Worth, for petitioners.

Jones, Trout, Flygare Moody, Charles B. Jones, Lubbock, Shafer, Gilliland, Davis, Bunton McCollum, Inc., Perry Davis, Jr. and James M. O'Leary, Odessa, for respondent.


The trial court granted Homer G. Maxey and five other plaintiffs a judgment following a jury trial whereby they recovered substantial damages from Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, Texas because of Bank's failure to exercise good faith in a private foreclosure sale of stock in plaintiffs' two closely held corporations. The court of civil appeals concluded that the jury's finding to the special issue inquiring as to the amount of the liabilities of Plaza Building Corporation at the time of the foreclosure sale was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. 571 S.W.2d 39.

This Court does not have jurisdiction to pass upon the fact question of the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. Tippett v. Brannon, 493 S.W.2d 511 (Tex. 1973).

We therefore refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error. In doing so, we express no opinion as to the correctness of the holding by the court of civil appeals that the award of prejudgment interest on the amount of actual damages recovered by plaintiffs is limited to the rate of six (6) percent per annum.


Summaries of

Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock

Supreme Court of Texas
May 2, 1979
580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1979)

In Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, 580 S.W.2d 340, 341 (Tex. 1979), that court expressly declined to express any opinion on the correctness of the Court of Civil Appeals' holding that prejudgment interest for a breach of contract occurring in 1966 was limited to a six percent rate. Furthermore, that court in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chance, 590 S.W.2d 703, 704 (Tex. 1979), permitted a nine percent rate to stand on an award to an insured who sued to recover for a fire loss, even though the applicable statutory rate for prejudgment interest was only six percent.

Summary of this case from Union Bank of Benton, Ark. v. First Nat. Bank

In Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, 580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1979), the court explicitly declined to express any opinion on the intermediate appellate court's holding that prejudgment interest was limited to a 6% rate. Next, the court on rehearing in Howze v.Surety Corporation of America, 584 S.W.2d 263 (Tex. 1979), reformed the judgment to include prejudgment interest at 6%.

Summary of this case from Dallas-Fort Worth, v. Combus. Equip. Assoc

In Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock, 580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1979), the court pointedly declined to express any opinion on the correctness of the Court of Civil Appeals' holding that prejudgment interest was limited to a 6% rate.

Summary of this case from First City Nat. Bank v. Haynes
Case details for

Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock

Case Details

Full title:Homer G. MAXEY et al., Petitioners, v. TEXAS COMMERCE BANK OF LUBBOCK…

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: May 2, 1979

Citations

580 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1979)

Citing Cases

Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. Fiberglass Insulators

The Supreme Court opinion in Allstate does not constitute a holding on this subject because no issue was…

Union Bank of Benton, Ark. v. First Nat. Bank

Although the Texas Supreme Court has not expressly declared that prejudgment interest awards above the…