From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauro v. Atlas Park

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 17, 2012
99 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-17

Michael A. MAURO, etc., appellant, v. ATLAS PARK, LLC, defendant, WMAP, LLC, respondent.

Michael A. Mauro, Glendale, N.Y., appellant pro se. Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Kieran X. Bastible of counsel), for respondent.


Michael A. Mauro, Glendale, N.Y., appellant pro se. Meyer, Suozzi, English & Klein, P.C., Garden City, N.Y. (Kieran X. Bastible of counsel), for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover rent payments made pursuant to a lease, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered July 12, 2011, which granted the motion of WMAP, LLC, pursuant to CPLR 1012 and 1013 for leave to intervene in the action as a defendant, and (2) an order of the same court entered August 16, 2011, which denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the third cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Atlas Park, LLC.

ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable by the plaintiff to WMAP, LLC.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the timely motion of WMAP, LLC (hereinafter WMAP), pursuant to CPLR 1012 and 1013 for leave to intervene in the action as a defendant. WMAP, which purchased the subject property, leased by the plaintiff, at a foreclosure sale after the instant action was commenced, has a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the proceedings ( see CLPR 1013; Berkoski v. Board of Trustees of Inc. Vil. of Southampton, 67 A.D.3d 840, 843, 889 N.Y.S.2d 623).

The Supreme Court also properly denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment on the third cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant Atlas Park, LLC, as the plaintiff failed to establish that the third cause of action was viable ( see McGee v. Dunn, 75 A.D.3d 624, 906 N.Y.S.2d 74).

RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mauro v. Atlas Park

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 17, 2012
99 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Mauro v. Atlas Park

Case Details

Full title:Michael A. MAURO, etc., appellant, v. ATLAS PARK, LLC, defendant, WMAP…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 17, 2012

Citations

99 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6928
951 N.Y.S.2d 915

Citing Cases

US Bank N.A. v. Carrington

We disagree with the Supreme Court's determination denying that branch of the appellant's motion which was…

Scharf v. Idaho Farmers Mkt. Inc.

Finally, since both sides concede that Idaho issued the Note to secure Poma's payment obligation under the…