From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maurice B. Cunningham, Inc. v. Denckla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1983
96 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

July 25, 1983


In an action to recover a brokerage commission, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered November 9, 1982, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of defendant. Judgment affirmed, with costs. There was no meeting of the minds between the defendant (seller) and the prospective purchaser with respect to all the essential contract terms (i.e., defendant never agreed to the additional terms proposed by the prospective purchaser). Therefore, no agreement was reached and the plaintiff broker is not entitled to a brokerage commission (see Kaelin v Warner, 27 N.Y.2d 352; Arnold v Schmeidler, 144 App. Div. 420). Furthermore, defendant did not act wrongfully or in bad faith by terminating the negotiations with the prospective purchaser, since no agreement had been reached. Defendant was free to negotiate with and sell to any other prospective purchaser (see Kaelin v Warner, supra, p 356). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maurice B. Cunningham, Inc. v. Denckla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 25, 1983
96 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Maurice B. Cunningham, Inc. v. Denckla

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE B. CUNNINGHAM, INC., Appellant, v. KATHERINE N. DENCKLA, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 25, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 580 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Proteus Books Ltd. v. Cherry Lane Music Co.

See 1 S. Williston, A Treatise on the Law of Contracts §§ 1, 22 (3d ed. 1957 Supp. 1988); see, e.g., Aces…

Lane-Real Estate Dept. Store v. Muchnick

For that reason as well, no commission was earned (Kaelin v Warner, 27 N.Y.2d 352, 355; Concordant Assocs. v…