From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews v. Dayton Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 3, 2018
Case No. 3:18-cv-026 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:18-cv-026

10-03-2018

Anthony Matthews, Plaintiff, v. Dayton Police Department, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE NEWMAN (ECF 35) THAT PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S FEDERAL CLAIMS BE DISMISSED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); THAT DEFENDANT SANDY'S TOWING AND RECOVERY'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (ECF 17) BE DENIED AS MOOT; THAT THE COURT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PRO SE PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS; AND THAT THIS CASE BE TERMINATED ON THE COURT'S DOCKET. THE COURT ADDITIONALLY FINDS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. (ECF 37).

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, (ECF 35), that recommends that pro se Plaintiff's federal claims be dismissed sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim; that Defendant Sandy's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF 17) be denied as moot; and that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation is correct. Wherefore, the Court ADOPTS Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman, (ECF 35), and DISMISSES pro se Plaintiff's federal claims sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim; DENIES AS MOOT Defendant Sandy's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF 17) and Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Mandamus (ECF 37); DECLINES to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims; and TERMINATES this case on the of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division at Dayton.

DONE and ORDERED this Wednesday, October 3, 2018.

s/Thomas M. Rose

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Matthews v. Dayton Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Oct 3, 2018
Case No. 3:18-cv-026 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Matthews v. Dayton Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Matthews, Plaintiff, v. Dayton Police Department, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Oct 3, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:18-cv-026 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 3, 2018)

Citing Cases

Mitchell v. Annucci

These allegations, though not a part of the Second Amended Complaint itself, are properly considered on the…