From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 372 (N.J. 1936)

Summary

In Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo, 13 N.J. Misc 878, 181 A. 901, it appeared the workman was employed to dig a ditch with pick and shovel.

Summary of this case from Associated Seed Growers v. Scrogham

Opinion

Submitted May 29, 1936 —

Decided October 2, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 878.

For the appellant, Edwin Joseph O'Brien.

For the respondent, Vincent A. deBennedetto.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 2, 1936
187 A. 372 (N.J. 1936)

In Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo, 13 N.J. Misc 878, 181 A. 901, it appeared the workman was employed to dig a ditch with pick and shovel.

Summary of this case from Associated Seed Growers v. Scrogham
Case details for

Matthews Construction Co. v. Ranallo

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. ANTONIO RANALLO, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1936

Citations

187 A. 372 (N.J. 1936)
187 A. 372

Citing Cases

Associated Seed Growers v. Scrogham

The scope of the New Jersey compensation law as to injuries covered is phrased like the other statutes we…