From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ziman v. St. Div. of H C Renewal

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1990
76 N.Y.2d 727 (N.Y. 1990)

Opinion

Argued April 26, 1990

Decided May 31, 1990

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Dennis Edwards, J.

Richard Hartzman and Dennis Hasher for appellant.

John H. Teschner for intervenors-appellants.

Sam Kazman and Bruce Levinson for respondents.

Martin J. Heistein and Andrew Schepard for Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. Carol S. Keenan, Ronald A. Zumbrun, Edward J. Connor, Jr., and R.S. Radford for Pacific Legal Foundation, amicus curiae.



Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 153 A.D.2d 489). We add only that, in view of the unrefuted evidence of hardship, including two unchallenged audit reports prepared by DHCR's own Accounting Division, it was not improper for the Appellate Division to remit the matter to DHCR with instructions to grant the petition.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA.


Summaries of

Matter of Ziman v. St. Div. of H C Renewal

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1990
76 N.Y.2d 727 (N.Y. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Ziman v. St. Div. of H C Renewal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JERROLD D. ZIMAN et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1990

Citations

76 N.Y.2d 727 (N.Y. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 876
557 N.E.2d 112

Citing Cases

Matter of Ziman v. State Div. of Hous. Community

Decided September 13, 1990 Appeal from ( 76 N.Y.2d 727) MOTIONS FOR REARGUMENT OR…

Rizzo v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

The matter at bar is readily distinguishable. This Court has held that the protection extended by the…