From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Weinstein v. Board of Regents

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1944
56 N.E.2d 104 (N.Y. 1944)

Opinion

Argued April 11, 1944

Decided May 18, 1944

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General ( Orrin G. Judd and Henry S. Manley of counsel), for appellant.

Benjamin C. Ribman, Myron M. Fineman and Horace M. Cohen for respondent.


Order of Appellate Division reversed and determination of the Board of Regents of the State of New York confirmed. The determination is supported by substantial evidence and the Appellate Division has no power under section 1296 of the Civil Practice Act to review such a determination "on the facts". ( Matter of Miller v. Kling, 291 N.Y. 65.) (See 293 N.Y. 589.)

Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ. Taking no part: RIPPEY, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Weinstein v. Board of Regents

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 18, 1944
56 N.E.2d 104 (N.Y. 1944)
Case details for

Matter of Weinstein v. Board of Regents

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IRVING B. WEINSTEIN, Respondent, against THE BOARD OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 18, 1944

Citations

56 N.E.2d 104 (N.Y. 1944)
56 N.E.2d 104

Citing Cases

Matter of Zimmerman v. Board of Regents

Reliance is placed upon Matter of Epstein v. Board of Regents ( 267 App. Div. 27, revd. 295 N.Y. 154) and…

Matter of Zeidler v. Bd. of Supervisors

We may only determine whether there is substantial evidence of misconduct in serious particulars. We may not…