From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Watinsky v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 1947
271 App. Div. 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

February 3, 1947.


On the facts in this record, it may not be held as a matter of law that the State Liquor Authority acted unreasonably, arbitrarily, or in bad faith. The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the authority, to whom the power to pass on the matter is given by statute. ( Matter of Glintenkamp v. O'Connell, 271 App. Div. 795, affd. 296 N.Y. 806; Matter of McKeon v. O'Connell, 271 App. Div. 897; Matter of Finn v. O'Connell, 271 App. Div. 896.) Lewis, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston and Nolan, JJ., concur; Aldrich, J., deceased.


Summaries of

Matter of Watinsky v. O'Connell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 1947
271 App. Div. 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Matter of Watinsky v. O'Connell

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE WATINSKY et al., Respondents, against JOHN F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1947

Citations

271 App. Div. 973 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Citing Cases

Matter of Snetlage v. O'Connell

There was no substantial dispute in respect of the character of the neighborhood; the character of the…

Matter of Forman v. N.Y.S. Liq. Auth

Apparently the State Liquor Authority in times past felt the same way as to its obligation in cases like…