From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 13, 1977
55 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Summary

In Matter of Walsh (55 A.D.2d 315) although we noted that "there was no venality or improper motive on the part of respondent in his failure to file income tax returns", we further noted that "there also can be no dispute that his failure to file constitutes professional misconduct" (supra, at 316) in imposing a period of suspension.

Summary of this case from Matter of Chervin

Opinion

January 13, 1977

Ronald Eisenman of counsel (Eileen Courtney with him on the brief), for petitioner.

No appearance on behalf of respondent.


William E. Walsh, Jr. was admitted to practice in the State of New York on November 4, 1940 in the First Department.

An information was filed against respondent in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on February 6, 1975, charging him with five counts of willfully and knowingly failing to file Federal income tax returns for the calendar years 1968 through 1972, inclusively. On September 16, 1975, he pleaded guilty to the counts charging him with willful failure to file income tax returns for the years 1968, 1969, and 1970. The counts relating to the other two years were dismissed. He was sentenced on December 2, 1975 to a prison term of 30 days on the first count and a suspended sentence on the other two counts, and was further placed on probation for a period of one year commencing upon expiration of his prison term.

Respondent has not contested any of these facts, and we therefore grant the motion to confirm the report of the Referee. With regard to the sanction to be imposed, we have taken into consideration respondent's respectable career both in the United States Army, from which he was retired as a colonel, and in the practice of law for 35 years.

Although there was no venality or improper motive on the part of respondent in his failure to file income tax returns, there also can be no dispute that his failure to file constitutes professional misconduct.

Respondent should be suspended for a period of six months (cf. Matter of Jaffe, 42 A.D.2d 26).

MARKEWICH, J.P., MURPHY, BIRNS, CAPOZZOLI and NUNEZ, JJ., concur.

Respondent suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York for a period of six months, effective February 14, 1977.


Summaries of

Matter of Walsh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 13, 1977
55 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

In Matter of Walsh (55 A.D.2d 315) although we noted that "there was no venality or improper motive on the part of respondent in his failure to file income tax returns", we further noted that "there also can be no dispute that his failure to file constitutes professional misconduct" (supra, at 316) in imposing a period of suspension.

Summary of this case from Matter of Chervin
Case details for

Matter of Walsh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIAM E. WALSH, JR., an Attorney, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1977

Citations

55 A.D.2d 315 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
390 N.Y.S.2d 612

Citing Cases

Matter of Mensch

Petitioner now moves, with the respondent's consent, for confirmation of its report and for the imposition of…

Matter of McCabe

Respondent does not question his conviction or the acts underlying it, nor does he dispute that in the…