From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Victor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1976
54 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 18, 1976


In a proceeding pursuant to article 7 of the Family Court Act, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated January 5, 1976, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent and directed his placement for a period of up to 18 months. Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a hearing in accordance herewith. No contentions have been raised with respect to the findings of fact upon which the adjudication of delinquency was based. Appellant was taken into custody and brought with his mother to a police station, where he was advised of his Miranda rights. He allegedly waived those rights and made a statement. Appellant requested a voir dire examination in order to test the lawfulness of the confession. The denial of that request was error (see Matter of Robert P., 40 A.D.2d 638). Mere cross-examination of the arresting officer did not afford appellant his full constitutional rights. He was entitled to take the stand and testify as to the circumstances of the confession without generally waiving his privilege against self incrimination and subjecting himself to broad cross-examination (see Matter of Gary C., 42 A.D.2d 704). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Victor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1976
54 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Matter of Victor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of VICTOR B., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 733 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Matter of George

A failure to move to suppress evidence before a fact-finding hearing will be deemed a waiver of that issue…

Matter of Ernesto

The Family Court denied appellant's application for a voir dire "to determine whether or not there was…