From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Vickery v. Village of Saugerties

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1985
480 N.E.2d 349 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided May 2, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Aaron E. Klein, J.

Richard J. Goldman for appellant.

Daniel N. Lamb, Sr., and Harvey Mandelkern for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion as a matter of law ( see, Matter of City of New York [ James St.], 21 N.Y.2d 293; see also, Amsterdam Sav. Bank v City View Mgt. Corp., 45 N.Y.2d 854).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

Matter of Vickery v. Village of Saugerties

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 2, 1985
480 N.E.2d 349 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Vickery v. Village of Saugerties

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HARRY VICKERY, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF SAUGERTIES…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1985

Citations

480 N.E.2d 349 (N.Y. 1985)
480 N.E.2d 349
490 N.Y.S.2d 735

Citing Cases

Sparkling Waters v. Shaw

Further, defendants have demonstrated prejudice. Prejudice may be established by a showing of change of…

Skrodelis v. Norbergs

The doctrine of laches is an equitable doctrine which bars the enforcement of a right where there has been an…