From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Uniondale Un. Free Sch. v. Newman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1988
140 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 23, 1988

Appeal from the Public Employment Relations Board.


Adjudged that the petition is granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to PERB for a new determination in accordance herewith.

The petitioner employs 400 teachers who are represented by the intervenor union. Of these 400, 17 are designated as chairpersons. It is these 17 people who wish to form their own bargaining unit. PERB determined, after a hearing, that the circumstances did not warrant the splintering of the present bargaining unit. It did so despite its own decisions which presented similar facts but arrived at the opposite conclusion.

"[U]nless [PERB's] determination was 'affected by an error of law' or was 'arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion', we will not interfere (CPLR 7803, subd 3)" (Matter of Incorporated Vil. of Lynbrook v New York State Pub. Employment Relations Bd., 48 N.Y.2d 398, 404). While we are therefore limited in our review, we must determine whether or not PERB's determination was "arbitrary and capricious". The Court of Appeals has said: "A decision of an administrative agency which neither adheres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Field Delivery Serv. [Roberts], 66 N.Y.2d 516, 516-517).

Here, PERB reached the opposite conclusion on essentially the same facts from that arrived at in two of its previous decisions, Matter of East Greenbush Cent. School Dist. (17 PERB ¶ 3083) and Matter of Hyde Park Cent. School Dist. (16 PERB ¶ 3083). It did so without explanation.

Its failure to explain its inconsistent determinations mandates that the instant determination be annulled (see, Matter of Health Related Nutrition Servs. [Roberts], 123 A.D.2d 466, 467-468). Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Uniondale Un. Free Sch. v. Newman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 23, 1988
140 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Matter of Uniondale Un. Free Sch. v. Newman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of UNIONDALE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, Petitioner, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 23, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 612 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Nassau Community College v. Nassau County

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with one bill of…

Claim of Caldas v. 86 Alda Restaurant, Inc.

In the absence of a discernible relationship between the Board's findings of fact and the conclusion reached…