From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

UAH-Braendly Hydro Associates v. RKDK Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1988
138 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

March 14, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Benson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, for a hearing limited to the issues raised in the third affirmative defense in the answer and the general denials of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the petition as set forth in paragraph 2 of the answer, and for a new determination based upon a resolution of those issues.

The petitioner condemnor holds a license from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct, operate and maintain a hydroelectric facility on certain land owned by the appellant condemnee. By virtue of the power of eminent domain vested under the license, the condemnor brought a proceeding under EDPL 402 to acquire title to that portion of the condemnee's land specified in the license.

The power of the condemnation court to entertain claims raised by the pleadings in a condemnation proceeding is limited to matters of procedural compliance not within the scope of review by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court (EDPL 207, 402 [B] [5]). As an affirmative defense, the condemnee contends that the proposed acquisition map delineates a land area greater than that specified as "project" area under the condemnor's license. This assertion presents a factual question which was properly raised in the condemnation court and warrants a hearing.

The challenge to the condemnor's compliance with ECL article 8, asserted as an affirmative defense, can be judicially reviewed only in a proceeding brought in the Supreme Court pursuant to CPLR article 78 (Pizzuti v. Metropolitan Tr. Auth., 67 N.Y.2d 1039).

All other issues raised in the answer are within the ambit of EDPL 207 and could have been reviewed by the Appellate Division upon a petition brought within 30 days after completion of publication of the condemnor's determination and findings. Having failed to timely bring such a petition, the condemnee cannot assert those issues in the condemnation court (EDPL 208). Mangano, J.P., Lawrence, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

UAH-Braendly Hydro Associates v. RKDK Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 14, 1988
138 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

UAH-Braendly Hydro Associates v. RKDK Associates

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of UAH-BRAENDLY HYDRO ASSOCIATES, Respondent, v. RKDK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 14, 1988

Citations

138 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

In the Matter of New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 2010 NY Slip Op 50301(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 3/1/2010)

"EDPL 402 (B) (5) provides that, upon the return date of the petition, upon . . . proof to its satisfaction…

In re Syracuse

title to a parcel of real property owned by respondent. SIDA previously authorized the condemnation of…