From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tuzzino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1964
22 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

October 1, 1964


Order entered April 13, 1964, denying respondent's motion for a stay of arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. Section 617 of article 17-A of the Insurance Law provides, in part, as follows: "The protection provided by this article shall not apply * * * unless the bodily injury to the insured or qualified person arose out of physical contact of the motor vehicle causing such bodily injury". There was an absence of physical contact between the offending vehicle and that of claimants. Hence, respondent-appellant is entitled to a stay of arbitration. ( Matter of MVAIC [ Stern], 21 A.D.2d 856; Matter of MVAIC [ Lupo], 18 A.D.2d 717, affd. 13 N.Y.2d 1017).

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ. [ 42 Misc.2d 786.]


Summaries of

Matter of Tuzzino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1964
22 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Matter of Tuzzino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Arbitration between JOSEPH TUZZINO et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Mvaic v. Eisenberg

The thought behind the phrase proclaims itself misread when the outcome of the reading is injustice or…

Motor Veh. Acc. Indemnification v. Eisenberg

Such contact is a condition precedent to arbitration under both the statute (Insurance Law, § 617) and the…