From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Franklin County v. Diamond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 8, 1975
36 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1975)

Opinion

Submitted March 10, 1975

Decided May 8, 1975

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Ruth Kessler Toch, Stanley Fishman and Julius Feinstein of counsel), and Robert J. Kafin for motions.

Charles S. Desmond and David N. Ellenhorn opposed.


Motions dismissed, with $20 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. The decision of the commissioner having been confirmed at the Appellate Division, movants cannot be said to be aggrieved parties (CPLR 5511) in consequence of views expressed in the opinion in that court which movants may argue in an appropriate case were not essential to its disposition.


Summaries of

Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Franklin County v. Diamond

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 8, 1975
36 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1975)
Case details for

Matter of Ton-Da-Lay, Franklin County v. Diamond

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TON-DA-LAY, LTD., Respondent, and FRANKLIN COUNTY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 8, 1975

Citations

36 N.Y.2d 856 (N.Y. 1975)
370 N.Y.S.2d 918
331 N.E.2d 695

Citing Cases

Ton-Da-Lay, Ltd. v. State

The CPLR article 78 proceeding was transferred to this court which, on May 16, 1974, affirmed the denial of…

Rella v. Berle

While there was a conflict of expert opinion on this issue, there was substantial evidence to support the…