From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Tibaldi v. Otten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1985
111 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

June 17, 1985

Appeal from the Family Court, Suffolk County (Campbell, J.).


Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Petitioner's request in this proceeding was predicated on the children's right to receive adequate support, and thus "it was not necessary to demonstrate an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances to justify an increase" ( Matter of Michaels v. Michaels, 56 N.Y.2d 924, 926). A sufficient factual basis for the upward modification in the best interests of the children has been established ( Stevenson v. Stevenson, 98 A.D.2d 718, 719).

Furthermore, upon review of the record, we find that petitioner has established "special circumstances" warranting the Family Court's direction to the father to pay for one half of Denise's college education ( Kaplan v. Wallshein, 57 A.D.2d 828, 829; Shapiro v. Shapiro, 116 Misc.2d 40, 45). By complying with the order, the father will be paying his fair share of this mutual obligation ( Giuffrida v. Giuffrida, 81 A.D.2d 905, 906). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Tibaldi v. Otten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 1985
111 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Tibaldi v. Otten

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANNE M. TIBALDI, Respondent, v. HERBERT J. OTTEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 1985

Citations

111 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Ragazzo v. Murray

The mother was not required to demonstrate an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances. It was…

Matter of Montagnino v. Montagnino

Contrary to the appellant's contention, the petitioner's request was predicated on the children's right to…