From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of the City of New York

Supreme Court, New York County
Feb 26, 1932
143 Misc. 129 (N.Y. Misc. 1932)

Opinion

February 26, 1932.

Arthur J. W. Hilly [John Lehman of counsel], for the city of New York.

Page Page [William H. Page and John G. Dalton of counsel], for the Bowman Biltmore Hotels Corporation and other property owners.

Shearman Sterling, for Robert Walton Goelet and others.

Parsons, Closson McIlvaine [Albert S. Wright of counsel], for the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art.

Middlebrook Singerbeaux [Thomas H. Baskerville of counsel], for the Manhattan Storage and Warehouse Company.

Edmund W. Van Voorhis [Herbert H. Maass of counsel], for Pershing Square Building Corporation.

George Welwood Murray, for the Equitable Trust Company of New York, as trustee, etc.

William Roberts, for Manhattan Railway Company.

James L. Quackenbush [J. Osgood Nichols of counsel], for the Interborough Rapid Transit Company.

Davies, Auerbach Cornell [H. C. McCollum of counsel], for the Central Hanover Bank and Trust Company.


This proceeding came on for trial before the late Mr. Justice MULLAN, who died after testimony was taken and a final decree prepared, but before the final decree could be signed. ( 141 Misc. 565.) The case was retried before me and the record, including all of the testimony and exhibits taken before Mr. Justice MULLAN, was introduced, all the parties consenting that it be received with the same force and effect as if the witnesses were called and had testified and the same objections therein had been made. I have viewed the premises and have carefully considered such testimony, the objections thereto and the exceptions reserved and I am fully in accord with those rulings and I allow all exceptions thereto taken. I concur in the awards made by Mr. Justice MULLAN and in the reasons therefor given in his opinion, which I adopt without setting them forth, since a repetition of them here would be fruitless. I award the sum of $619,352.41 for the property taken. The corporation counsel is directed to prepare a tentative decree.


Summaries of

Matter of the City of New York

Supreme Court, New York County
Feb 26, 1932
143 Misc. 129 (N.Y. Misc. 1932)
Case details for

Matter of the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of THE CITY OF NEW York, Relative to…

Court:Supreme Court, New York County

Date published: Feb 26, 1932

Citations

143 Misc. 129 (N.Y. Misc. 1932)
257 N.Y.S. 37

Citing Cases

Roberts v. New York City

41; the scrap value of the structure was fixed at $235; the value of the franchise nothing. 143 Misc. (N.Y.)…